A State Office formal has lamented the US military’s exit from Afghanistan as terrible for females, allegedly airing the “private” thoughts of several others. But the chatting stage also mirrors an notorious leaked CIA memo.
Molly Montgomery, deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs, expressed apprehension about the conclude of the United States’ approximately 20-yr profession of Afghanistan, professing that the withdrawal would have devastating penalties for Afghan gals and women.
“Woke up with a significant heart, pondering about all the Afghan gals and women I worked with throughout my time in Kabul,” Montgomery tweeted on Friday. “They were being the beneficiaries of lots of of the gains we created, and now they stand to eliminate every thing. We empowered them to guide, and now we are powerless to defend them.”
The message was deleted shortly immediately after it was posted. A spokesperson for the Condition Department instructed inquiring media retailers that Montgomery “deleted the tweet on her individual volition.”
There has been rising concern about the fate of Afghan women of all ages, as a sweeping Taliban offensive continues to seize extra territory in the nation. The militant team works by using Sharia law, less than which women are subordinate to guys. In the previous, the Taliban have been accused of flogging and stoning girls accused of indecency.
Although the tweet may perhaps have been voluntarily eliminated, its provocative connotations look to clash with the Biden administration’s framing of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan. The exit has been greatly criticized by media stores and Beltway insiders as premature and irresponsible.
Jonathan Swan, a reporter for Axios, claimed that the scrubbed tweet “captures the personal feelings of quite a few other people.”
Some replies expressed sympathy with the place, suggesting that the US could just take in much more Afghan refugees.
The way to defend them is confess them into our nation as refugees.We used 20 years and a trillion dollars in Afghanistan for it to crumble overnight. I’m not guaranteed one more 20 years would have a distinct final result
— sam deutsch (@samdman95) August 13, 2021
But his assertion that Montgomery’s beliefs had been common did not appear to reflect the responses on social media. Numerous tweets questioned regardless of whether the US had even built “gains” in Afghanistan in excess of the past 20 decades.
We produced no “gains” for any individual, male or woman. We shed 2300+ armed service life, and 20,000+ wounded in motion. There had been by no means gains. There was Taliban tolerance. My heart breaks for the soldiers we place in harm’s way for very little, and their people.
— Real Blue Patriot (@TrueBluPatriot) August 13, 2021
Maybe a further 20 a long time will do the trick
— Arthur Paine (@johnlecare) August 13, 2021
Just one commenter explained that, although they agreed with Montgomery, they have been annoyed that they ended up only now listening to about the plight of Afghan girls.
Nonetheless, there is nothing new about Montgomery’s messaging. In a leaked memo from March 2010, an elite CIA “problem-solving” team, recognized as the “Red Cell,” proposed that the greatest way to battle apathy and opposition to the war in Afghanistan was to spotlight the “aspirations” of Afghan ladies and “their fears of a Taliban victory.”
The memorandum coincided with a include tale about an Afghan lady, Bibi Aisha, who allegedly experienced her nose slash off by the Taliban. But the heart-wrenching media tale shortly came less than scrutiny. Ann Jones, a journalist for The Nation who understood Bibi personally, stated that the Taliban were being never involved. In accordance to Jones, the teen told her that “her father-in-legislation caught up with her after she ran away, and took a knife to her on his own.” In a response to the Time story, Jones wrote that women had “already been abandoned” in Afghanistan and pointed to the “creeping Talibanization of Afghan life” under the US-backed authorities.
Curiously, Richard Stengel, the managing editor of Time when the Bibi deal with story was posted, later acquired a job as the Condition Department’s “chief propagandist” – to use his own terms. In 2018, he claimed all through a panel dialogue that “I’m not versus propaganda” and “I really do not always feel [propaganda is] that awful.”
Like this tale? Share it with a close friend!